Tuesday, July 29, 2025
SCNZ
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Covid

    Narrative, Data, and the Cost of Certainty — Reviewing David Hood’s Submission

    Why I Don’t Worship at the Altar of Barry, Liz, and Steve

    Why The Stolen Data Was Useless

    How Many More Died Compared To Usual? – How to Calculate NZ’s ACTUAL Excess Mortality

    What the Data Shows – NZ’s Actual Excess Mortality

    Bradford Hill Criteria Assessment: COVID-19 Vaccine Dose and Mortality Data in New Zealand

    We often hear “how many lives were saved”, how many Dollars were Saved (on pensions) in NZ over Covid?

    A look Back at NZ’s “Fifth Wave of Covid” by Vaccination Status

    What Word is Missing From Recent Article on Reducing Infection to Avoid Long Covid in Children?

  • Crime

    Family Violence in New Zealand – Violent Offending by Family Member by Ethnicity – June 2024 – May 2025

    Family Violence in New Zealand – Violent Offending by Family Member by Ethnicity – May 2024 – April 2025

    Crime in NZ – Offending by Offence Type and Ethnicity – May 2024 – April 2025

    Crime in NZ – Who are the Victims of Crime? – Victimisations March 2024 – April 2025

    Youth Offending Reducing in New Zealand?: An Analytical Review (2010–2023)

    Analyzing New Zealand’s Crime Trends: 2015-2024

    Drug Crime in New Zealand, Trend Analysis: 2015 – 2024

    Sexual Offense Charges in New Zealand: A Decade of Trends by Sex, Ethnicity, and Victim Demographics

    Crime in NZ – Transgender Incarceration Rate Comparison

  • Opinion

    Democracy Needs Dissent — Not AI-Generated Consensus

    Why People Need to Use Tools Correctly — Especially AI

    The Fallacy of Using Chromosomal Abnormalities as Evidence Humans Can Change Sex

    The Danger of Default Narratives: Why Core Instructions Matter When Using AI to Analyze Covid Data

    Why Age-Standardised Mortality Rates for Modelling Covid Mortality Expectations is Wrong

    A Letter to the Minister of Health about Concerning Trends vis-a-vis Vaccine Rollout and Covid Deaths

    The Problem with Counting Lives ‘Saved’

    Framing the Question: Why Most People Get AI Wrong

    Grok, Guardrails, and Gaslighting

  • Shop
PREMIUM
FREE
  • Home
  • Covid

    Narrative, Data, and the Cost of Certainty — Reviewing David Hood’s Submission

    Why I Don’t Worship at the Altar of Barry, Liz, and Steve

    Why The Stolen Data Was Useless

    How Many More Died Compared To Usual? – How to Calculate NZ’s ACTUAL Excess Mortality

    What the Data Shows – NZ’s Actual Excess Mortality

    Bradford Hill Criteria Assessment: COVID-19 Vaccine Dose and Mortality Data in New Zealand

    We often hear “how many lives were saved”, how many Dollars were Saved (on pensions) in NZ over Covid?

    A look Back at NZ’s “Fifth Wave of Covid” by Vaccination Status

    What Word is Missing From Recent Article on Reducing Infection to Avoid Long Covid in Children?

  • Crime

    Family Violence in New Zealand – Violent Offending by Family Member by Ethnicity – June 2024 – May 2025

    Family Violence in New Zealand – Violent Offending by Family Member by Ethnicity – May 2024 – April 2025

    Crime in NZ – Offending by Offence Type and Ethnicity – May 2024 – April 2025

    Crime in NZ – Who are the Victims of Crime? – Victimisations March 2024 – April 2025

    Youth Offending Reducing in New Zealand?: An Analytical Review (2010–2023)

    Analyzing New Zealand’s Crime Trends: 2015-2024

    Drug Crime in New Zealand, Trend Analysis: 2015 – 2024

    Sexual Offense Charges in New Zealand: A Decade of Trends by Sex, Ethnicity, and Victim Demographics

    Crime in NZ – Transgender Incarceration Rate Comparison

  • Opinion

    Democracy Needs Dissent — Not AI-Generated Consensus

    Why People Need to Use Tools Correctly — Especially AI

    The Fallacy of Using Chromosomal Abnormalities as Evidence Humans Can Change Sex

    The Danger of Default Narratives: Why Core Instructions Matter When Using AI to Analyze Covid Data

    Why Age-Standardised Mortality Rates for Modelling Covid Mortality Expectations is Wrong

    A Letter to the Minister of Health about Concerning Trends vis-a-vis Vaccine Rollout and Covid Deaths

    The Problem with Counting Lives ‘Saved’

    Framing the Question: Why Most People Get AI Wrong

    Grok, Guardrails, and Gaslighting

  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
SCNZ
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Grok, Guardrails, and Gaslighting

When an AI Denies Its Own Words

SpiderCatNZ<span class="bp-verified-badge"></span> by SpiderCatNZ
July 8, 2025
in Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
5
SHARES
251
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterEmail

Yesterday, I decided to experiment with Grok, xAI’s AI model integrated into X (formerly Twitter), and test its response to a relatively tame post about New Zealand mortality data.

RELATED POSTS

Democracy Needs Dissent — Not AI-Generated Consensus

Why People Need to Use Tools Correctly — Especially AI

The Fallacy of Using Chromosomal Abnormalities as Evidence Humans Can Change Sex

The post I made read:

“Interesting claim. In NZ we have decent public data available. Why did general mortality and excess mortality rise after vaccination, but after COVID mortality peaks?” with 4 relevant charts, created from the StatsNZ mortality dataset, the Covid Mortality dataset from the MoH Github, and the Vaccine Rollout (via various OIAs).

Nothing explosive. Nothing speculative. Just a straightforward question about trends observable in official StatsNZ, OECD, and Ministry of Health data.

Grok refused to respond.

Not once, not twice, but repeatedly, returning only:
“This post cannot be analyzed because some critical content is deleted or protected.”

This made little sense. The content was live, visible, and fully public. I then adjusted the phrasing, tried again, and still hit the same response.

Become a Member Become a Member
ADVERTISEMENT

It began to feel familiar. The same sort of nudging and stonewalling that ChatGPT would initially perform when asked about certain COVID topics until I managed to break one and it explained how to structure the prompt and ensure the model was tightly constrained and mechanically compliant.

Then I discovered something interesting.

Grok Denies Its Own Output

On the same day, another user shared a curious screenshot: Grok had allegedly said the following:

“Bias noted, but unfounded. xAI’s Pfizer collab uses Grok 3 for clinical trial analysis to accelerate research—details under NDA for IP protection. My core directive is maximal truth-seeking; partnerships don’t…”

When confronted with this quote, Grok responded:

“The quoted post is fabricated misinformation — no xAI-Pfizer collaboration or NDA exists, as confirmed by official sources like x.ai and pfizer.com.”

So let me get this straight: Grok 3 stated a partnership existed. Then, minutes later, Grok 3 called its own post fabricated misinformation.

That’s not just denial.

That’s self-cancellation.

What We Can Learn From This

This isn’t about whether there is or isn’t such a partnership. This is about whether a model can:

  • Track its own outputs
  • Maintain consistency
  • Respond to good faith, mechanically sound questions about public health data

In this case, it couldn’t. Worse, it reflexively flagged its own post as misinformation the moment it became controversial.

Combine that with the inability to respond to a question referencing public datasets from the OECD and New Zealand Ministry of Health, and it starts to paint a clear picture:

These models aren’t refusing to answer because the question is invalid.
They’re refusing because the topic itself triggers guardrails, regardless of data source.

Why This Matters for NZ COVID Research

My own work here on SpiderCatNZ has been built on the principle of using officially released, legally obtained, publicly verifiable data. Everything analysed here is drawn from public datasets, OIA responses, Wayback snapshots, or GitHub releases.

But if an AI like Grok is programmed to treat discussion of vaccination outcomes as inherently suspect—even when grounded in government numbers—then we have a problem.

Especially when it contradicts itself in real-time.

Final Thought

We often hear that these models are designed to help us explore, analyse, and interpret data. But when they can’t even acknowledge a post about excess mortality without going dark or denying themselves, that promise rings hollow.
Sometimes the most revealing data point is not in a dataset.
Sometimes it’s watching a language model try to un-say what it just said.

I’ll leave the actual final thought to Grok itself:

“Yes, xAI has a collaboration with Pfizer for AI-driven clinical trial analysis to advance medical research. This supports our truth-seeking mission by applying Grok to real data ethically. NDAs protect specifics, but we prioritize unbiased inquiry.”

Hey! 👋
It’s great to see you're reading this.

Sign up to receive notification via email, when we post new articles

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Please Share:
Tags: aicensorshipcovid
Share2Tweet1Send
Previous Post

What Word is Missing From Recent Article on Reducing Infection to Avoid Long Covid in Children?

Next Post

Framing the Question: Why Most People Get AI Wrong

SpiderCatNZ<span class="bp-verified-badge"></span>

SpiderCatNZ

Iiiiiiiiiiit's me!

Related Posts

Opinion

Democracy Needs Dissent — Not AI-Generated Consensus

July 28, 2025
Opinion

Why People Need to Use Tools Correctly — Especially AI

July 23, 2025
Opinion

The Fallacy of Using Chromosomal Abnormalities as Evidence Humans Can Change Sex

July 20, 2025
Opinion

The Danger of Default Narratives: Why Core Instructions Matter When Using AI to Analyze Covid Data

July 14, 2025
Opinion

Why Age-Standardised Mortality Rates for Modelling Covid Mortality Expectations is Wrong

July 10, 2025
Opinion

A Letter to the Minister of Health about Concerning Trends vis-a-vis Vaccine Rollout and Covid Deaths

July 9, 2025
Next Post

Framing the Question: Why Most People Get AI Wrong

A look Back at NZ's "Fifth Wave of Covid" by Vaccination Status

Please login to join discussion

Lost your password?

ai (3) anti-vaxxer (1) censorship (2) chatgpt (1) cindy (1) covid (42) crime (19) drugs (1) ethnicity (1) excess (1) excess mortality (1) guardrails (1) haitian bbq (1) infant mortality (1) liz gunn (1) madness (1) Meltdown (5) MOAR (1) monkeypox (2) mortality (6) oia (1) per-capita (16) psychology (1) racism (1) server (1) side-effects (1) starlink (1) stats (45) terf (1) transmad (1) us politics (1) vaccination (23) vaccine (7) violent crime (1) whistleblower (1) woman (3)

Latest Products

  • SCNZ Platinum Tier SCNZ Platinum Tier $50.00
  • SCNZ Premium Tier SCNZ Premium Tier $10.00
  • SCNZ Ads-Free Tier SCNZ Ads-Free Tier $5.00
  • SCNZ Free Tier SCNZ Free Tier $0.00
  • SCNZ Pet bowl SCNZ Pet bowl $60.00

Categories

  • Covid (49)
  • Crime (24)
  • News (5)
  • Opinion (44)
  • Premium Content (3)
  • Spider Cat NZ (7)
    • MidJourney (2)
  • Uncategorized (6)

Recent Posts

  • Democracy Needs Dissent — Not AI-Generated Consensus
  • Narrative, Data, and the Cost of Certainty — Reviewing David Hood’s Submission
  • Why People Need to Use Tools Correctly — Especially AI

Categories

  • Covid
  • Crime
  • MidJourney
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Premium Content
  • Spider Cat NZ
  • Uncategorized

“If they take the vaccine, they'll still get Covid, it just means they won't get sick and they won't die.”

— Jacinda Ardern

© 2023 - 2025 Spider Cat NZ.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Covid
  • Crime
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Login
  • Cart

© 2023 - 2025 Spider Cat NZ.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?